Assignment.docx – EssaysForYou




Assignment

.  Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29, 2231–2238.

Once this is complete, save your file and submit the Journal Club Template for Qualitative Research to the submission link. Note that you must use the template provided.

NURS_3150_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_3150_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Design

15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
Student provided a fully developed explanation of the research design with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
Student provided a developed discussion of the research design with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts
Basic
Student provided a minimally developed discussion of the research design with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed discussion of the research design with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample Selection

15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
Student provided a fully developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
Student provided a developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts
Basic
Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Methods

15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
Student provided a fully developed explanation of the data collection methods with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
Student provided a developed explanation of the data collection methods with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts
Basic
Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the data collection methods with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed explanation of the data collection methods with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan for Data Analysis

15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
Student provided a fully developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
Student provided a developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts
Basic
Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies and describes the strengths and weaknesses of the research method used based on the elements of trustworthiness.

25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Student provided a fully developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the elements of trustworthiness.

22 to >19.0 pts
Proficient
Student provided a developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the elements of trustworthiness.

19 to >17.0 pts
Basic
Student provided a minimally developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the elements of trustworthiness.

17 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Student provided an under-developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the elements of trustworthiness.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization

5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.

4 to >3.5 pts
Proficient
Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.

3.5 to >3.0 pts
Basic
Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

3 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone

5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

4 to >3.5 pts
Proficient
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

3.5 to >2.0 pts
Basic
Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

2 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Attributions and Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1″ margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.

5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting with no errors in the template provided.

4 to >3.5 pts
Proficient
Demonstrates developed APA formatting with few formatting errors in the template provided.

3.5 to >3.0 pts
Basic
Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting with several formatting errors in the template provided.

3 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Demonstrates limited APA formatting with multiple formatting errors or fails to use the template provided.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Is this the question you were looking for? Place your Order Here

 Get 20% OFF on your next order

Join LindasHelp mail List NOW to unlock 20% OFF instantly 

Essays, Power Point, Discussion, Labs, & Final exams